I like the idea of rating, but wouldn’t that maybe upset people or get people very competitive on trying to achieve a higher score?
I personally don’t mind it, not saying I’m really good at certain areas (i’m actually garbage), but I was just thinking someone would get frustrated at this idea. So I would be a little considerate of this and try to be flexible about it.
Also on the rating, is it like the lowest number the better, or higher?
I heard that you said something about being limited to posts cause you’re recently new, so if you do run out, then edit your last message saying so.
Not sure if new users can edit posts, but its worth a shot.
There isn’t a heirarchy to flowlab, and everyone has their own specific strengths and weaknesses. I for one am good at a lot of programming not just flowlab, but I am known for being s community builder.
My recommendation would be to take knowledge learned by billion-dollar corporations and not do this.
Instead, try making different positions like ‘Head of the Art Department’ or ‘Lead Programmer’. This gives your ‘number 1’ person the authority they need, without making your company compete with itself (which, (1) is a horrible business practice that leads to divisions and (2) is not what ‘unity’ is about.)
At the same time, I see what you are trying to accomplish, and applaud your big-brain idea, but I’m just trying to refine it into a more productive form of corporate hierarchy (because that is what you are trying to accomplish on a small-scale degree).
Also, I agree with @meburningslime. To fully utilize a team, you have to stick to strengths and avoid weaknesses. This means that you shouldn’t just have three jobs, but have smaller, more specialized sub-catagories.
You’re literally a tl1 ripoff lol. We could do some combination of teams if u want lol, especially because over 70% of your team is apart of my team lol.