Really, the only thing I’m worried about is music.
2 Likes
You guys should do another compilation of the top 12 flowjam games like you did a while back
1 Like
Hi Flowlabbers! As some of you may already know, the Flowjam 2026 event came to an end last month!
This time, the game jam received 37 unique games, and as always, all the games were made with Flowlab in the span of 2 weeks! That’s awesome! 
Congratulations to everyone who submitted a game! Making a game in 2 weeks is quite the challenge, so be proud of yourself!
Flowjam 2026 has ended, and “Antlympus” by @Greggo won! 
Antlympus is a charming and beautifully crafted puzzle platformer where you get creative with how you can use the bodies of your ant friends to climb your way to the top!
A creative, polished, and fun game with a very clever use of the “Echoes of the Past” jam theme.
Did I mention it has the cutest character designs?
We hope everyone had fun making games alongside the community!
Even if you didn’t submit a game, you can still play all the games, and comment your thoughts under each one! 
You can see the Flowjam '26 Results and Play the Games here:
https://itch.io/jam/winter-flowjam-2026/results
Antlympus by Greggo 
Use the power of the ant gods and your fellow ants to scale Mount Antlympus!
Play Antlympus here: https://gregorywalker.itch.io/antlympus
7 Likes
Congrats Greggo!
6 Likes
100% deserved win W game
5 Likes
Take notes, The Judges like sandbox games… 
2 Likes
I think games that allow for more creative decisions for the player are more popular than more linear progression, since it allows you to shape how you play.
Also, everyone who submits a game, gets to review and rate the other games so it’s not selected judge(s), but a more democratic scoring.
3 Likes
POV: You submit a game that allows everyone to vote for each others. (Yall know there will bound to be cheaters)
1 Like
Not necessarily. Only legit or actually made games are allowed. For example, if someone creates a new game within the time period and submits a blank game, just to have access to voting, the game will just get denied and you won’t be able to vote. I also think a game has to be at a certain point in development to pass, such as have an ending or enough content to be considered a game. This also helps to reduce the number of games that actually need rated and makes the process faster.
If someone does make a decent game but goes around and votes everyone else’s projects unfairly or very poorly, I think all ratings that are way too critical or not enough effort are also removed. I don’t think anyone has done this since I don’t know why you would spend the effort making a game, just to ruin your reputation by belittling other developers.
Even though it’s through community voting, grazer still has the final say on the winner and oversees the reviews to make sure nothing unfair does happen. Since the community is still rather small, I don’t think this is much of an issue or has ever been much of a problem previously with reviews.
4 Likes
y’all put a lot of thought into this
2 Likes